Now With More Than 3600 Reviews! Go Nuts - Read 'Em All!!

WELCOME! Use the search engines on this site (or your own off-site engine of choice) to gain easy access to the complete MAKSQUIBS Archive; over 3600 posts and counting. (New posts added every day or so.)

You can check on all our titles by typing the Title, Director, Actor or 'Keyword' of your choice in the Search Engine of your choice (include the phrase MAKSQUIBS) or just use the BLOGGER Search Box at the top left corner of the page.

Feel free to place comments directly on any of the film posts and to test your film knowledge with the CONTESTS scattered here & there. (Hey! No Googling allowed. They're pretty easy.)

Send E-mails to . (Let us know if the TRANSLATE WIDGET works!) Or use the Profile Page or Comments link for contact.

Thanks for stopping by.

Monday, August 8, 2011


At its core, William Friedkin’s popular (and wildly influential) film is just a down-and-dirty police procedural about a narcotics ring. Its two big set pieces (a wild car chase under an elevated subway train & a cat-and-mouse subway fake-out for Gene Hackman’s police detective & drug importer Fernando Rey) are almost too well known. Yet, after launching a thousand films & tv shows, the film retains (or has it regained?) its lively sense of cinematic discovery, especially in how it displays the soiled & sordid nature of its main supporting character, ‘Fun City’ New York. No wonder Friedkin & lenser Owen Roizman ‘stole’ so many street location shots. (Watch for real-life gawkers in the background.) But tacky period flavor and a swell cast (what a kick to see the young Roy Schieder as Hackman’s partner) only partly explain why the sum is so much greater than the film’s fairly ordinary parts, even with an ending that’s a bit of mess. Perhaps it was Friedkin’s faith in his rapport with the public, a faith that held for his follow up pic (THE EXORCIST/’73), then vanished as mysteriously at it had appeared. He never quite found it again.

No comments: