Now With More Than 3600 Reviews! Go Nuts - Read 'Em All!!

WELCOME! Use the search engines on this site (or your own off-site engine of choice) to gain easy access to the complete MAKSQUIBS Archive; over 3600 posts and counting. (New posts added every day or so.)

You can check on all our titles by typing the Title, Director, Actor or 'Keyword' of your choice in the Search Engine of your choice (include the phrase MAKSQUIBS) or just use the BLOGGER Search Box at the top left corner of the page.

Feel free to place comments directly on any of the film posts and to test your film knowledge with the CONTESTS scattered here & there. (Hey! No Googling allowed. They're pretty easy.)

Send E-mails to . (Let us know if the TRANSLATE WIDGET works!) Or use the Profile Page or Comments link for contact.

Thanks for stopping by.

Sunday, March 22, 2015


Long established as a major achievement from Robert Altman’s early ‘70s hot streak (rightly so), it’s easy to forget the initial resentment generated by this smartly reimagined Raymond Chandler/Philip Marlowe deconstruction. (United Artists rushed in a larky second ad campaign from MAD Magazine’s Jack Davis to reposition the film; note our schizophrenic posters.) Whatever was the problem? A considerable step up from the last MARLOWE pic (James Garner/’69); traditionalists got a decent Robert Mitchum take from FAREWELL, MY LOVELY/’75. But this New Age California Marlowe offered a much needed jolt, often comic, but never stooping to guy the material, in Leigh Brackett’s screenplay. (After four scripts for Howard Hawks, including THE BIG SLEEP/’46, she’d next work on STAR WARS: THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK/’80.)

Brackett plays the stories & characters very close to the vest before pulling the strands together (Marlowe helps a pal ‘disappear’ just as some stolen loot & a murder rap come to call), so the opening reels play out in the same California haze so atmospherically caught by Vilmos Zsigmond in his squint-your-eyes,‘flashed negative’ lensing. With the exception of Sterling Hayden’s Hemingwayesque writer, Altman casts the film, to striking success, with a series of unlikely dares. Elliot Gould, always at his best for Altman, effortlessly wears Marlowe’s ironic sadism (though his spiffy vintage car was a bad call) while the real-life notoriety of Nina van Pallandt comes thru as the lying femme fatale. Baseball’s Jim Bouton, LAUGH-IN’s Henry Gibson, and that mediocre director Mark Rydell as a vicious hood, all manage to freshen murder-mystery archetypes. Plus, a bonus in a bulked up, very young Arnold Schwarzenegger eager to strip down. Not everything works here, Altman doesn’t have the technical chops to run a tricky set piece where Gould, on foot in the streets of L.A., chases after a car. But there are many more hits than misses in this site specific, tone specific, era specific effort that busts open and honors its well-worn genre.

DOUBLE-BILL: After much wandering, Altman returned to form putting Chandleresque tropes inside the movie biz on THE PLAYER/’92, though Michael Tolkin’s cynical script hasn’t aged as well as Brackett’s.

No comments: