Now Over 5500 Reviews and (near) Daily Updates!

WELCOME! Use the search engines on this site (or your own off-site engine of choice) to gain easy access to the complete MAKSQUIBS Archive; more than 5500 posts and counting. (New posts added every day or so.)

You can check on all our titles by typing the Title, Director, Actor or 'Keyword' you're looking for in the Search Engine of your choice (include the phrase MAKSQUIBS) or just use the BLOGSPOT.com Search Box at the top left corner of the page.

Feel free to place comments directly on any of the film posts and to test your film knowledge with the CONTESTS scattered here & there. (Hey! No Googling allowed. They're pretty easy.)

Send E-mails to MAKSQUIBS@yahoo.com . (Let us know if the TRANSLATE WIDGET works!) Or use the Profile Page or Comments link for contact.

Thanks for stopping by.

Sunday, April 26, 2015

LETTER FROM AN UNKNOWN WOMAN (1948)

Generally considered the best of Max Ophüls’ Hollywood films (it’s not, that’d be THE RECKLESS MOMENT/’49), but why quibble among his three late ‘40s glories? (CAUGHT/’49 fills out the trio.) This bittersweet romantic tragedy, set in turn-of-the-last-century Vienna, follows a teen on the cusp of womanhood (Joan Fontaine) spellbound for life in undeserved rapture to Louis Jourdan’s gifted & glamorous, if facile, concert pianist. Told in flashback, as the once-promising musician reads a confessional letter from this unknown woman, his rekindled memories explain his loss, but can’t change it. Superbly designed by Alexander Golitzen, and shot by the great cinematographer Franz Planer who did Ophüls’ earlier fate-filled Viennese romance, LIEBELEI/’33 (more echt-local flavor/less production fluidity). Unlike other pantheon directors attracted to similar material, say, Frank Borzage or Douglas Sirk, Ophüls steers clear of, rather than into melodrama, avoiding ‘bad’ laughs with a tart sensibility and an unchallenged technical finesse. (Watch how he almost repeats an overhead angle used when Jourdan brings an anonymous l’amour to his apartment, then adds a new flourish when Fontaine goes in. (It's like a visual equivalent to Chopin’s First Ballade where the main theme returns ‘corrected.’) Initially rejected at the box-office, perhaps Fontaine’s limited emotional range and Jourdan’s limited warmth were just too dry for popular consumption, that sec quality is now quite rightly prized.

DOUBLE-BILL: Ophüls refined this kind of story to near perfection in THE EARRINGS OF MADAME DE . . . /’53. But don’t ignore the tear-stained charm of LIEBELEI, mentioned above.  Here’s an acceptable free link.  https://archive.org/details/liebelei-1933

No comments: