Now Over 5500 Reviews and (near) Daily Updates!

WELCOME! Use the search engines on this site (or your own off-site engine of choice) to gain easy access to the complete MAKSQUIBS Archive; more than 5500 posts and counting. (New posts added every day or so.)

You can check on all our titles by typing the Title, Director, Actor or 'Keyword' you're looking for in the Search Engine of your choice (include the phrase MAKSQUIBS) or just use the BLOGSPOT.com Search Box at the top left corner of the page.

Feel free to place comments directly on any of the film posts and to test your film knowledge with the CONTESTS scattered here & there. (Hey! No Googling allowed. They're pretty easy.)

Send E-mails to MAKSQUIBS@yahoo.com . (Let us know if the TRANSLATE WIDGET works!) Or use the Profile Page or Comments link for contact.

Thanks for stopping by.

Thursday, February 18, 2021

THE LIGHT THAT FAILED (1939)

Ronald Colman, whose combination of box-office clout & prestige allowed him to roam the Hollywood ‘majors’ for bespoke vehicles like few stars of his day, went to Paramount for two exceptional literary properties: Rudyard Kipling’s LIGHT following hard on a fantasia about rabble-rousing 15th Century French poet François Villon in IF I WERE KING/’38.*  Neither quite hits its potential, largely due to miscast directors, yet both such whales-of-a-tale, and Colman such splendid company, they’re unmissable.  (It hardly matters that Colman is twice the age of his character in the book.)  Kipling’s first long-form work has a great narrative thru-line after its childhood prologue, as Colman’s war correspondent artist moves from battle in the Sudan to study & dissipation in Port Said, then sudden commercial success in London.  Poised between Madonna & whore in the form of now grown childhood friend/fellow artist Maisie (Muriel Angelus), and his correspondent friend’s street pickup, Bessie (Ida Lupino), whom he uses as model for his magnum opus, ‘Melancholia.’  In different ways, they each fail him nearly as completely as his fading eyesight, his main support coming from male war correspondent chums led by Walter Huston.  Kipling’s attitude perhaps less misogynist than fear of the unknown.  (Note the rare use of a ‘bromantic’ renunciation speech from Colman to Huston.)  Loaded with ‘boy’s own’ adventure tropes, the film, while relatively faithful to the book, skips over Maisie’s talented red-headed roommate, as well as much of the exciting blindman’s journey back to the front.  (Why replace a ride thru enemy territory shared with an unreliable guide on a two-humped Bactrian camel for galloping horses?)  We also miss a sense of spaciousness in William Wellman’s blunt direction and there’s little sweep to Victor Young’s unusually insensitive score.  But even with lesser elements, it’s close enough to let Colman & Kipling get their effects across.

DOUBLE-BILL/LINK: *On the whole, IF I WERE KING, with it’s very special Preston Sturges screenplay, is the one to try first.  https://maksquibs.blogspot.com/2019/05/if-i-were-king-1938.html

SCREWY THOUGHT OF THE DAY: Our previous post had a musician lose his hearing; here a painter goes blind.  What next?  A baker’s lost sense of taste, a perfumier’s sense of smell, a masseuse’s touch?

No comments: