Now Over 5500 Reviews and (near) Daily Updates!

WELCOME! Use the search engines on this site (or your own off-site engine of choice) to gain easy access to the complete MAKSQUIBS Archive; more than 5500 posts and counting. (New posts added every day or so.)

You can check on all our titles by typing the Title, Director, Actor or 'Keyword' you're looking for in the Search Engine of your choice (include the phrase MAKSQUIBS) or just use the BLOGSPOT.com Search Box at the top left corner of the page.

Feel free to place comments directly on any of the film posts and to test your film knowledge with the CONTESTS scattered here & there. (Hey! No Googling allowed. They're pretty easy.)

Send E-mails to MAKSQUIBS@yahoo.com . (Let us know if the TRANSLATE WIDGET works!) Or use the Profile Page or Comments link for contact.

Thanks for stopping by.

Monday, August 28, 2023

VALLEY OF THE DOLLS (1967)

Recently undergoing something of a critical reevaluation (the book more than the film), up-to-date ‘party line’ critical academic theory now values Jacqueline Susann’s purple prose page-turners as a pop feminine litmus test of changing social norms.  It makes for a nice PhD thesis, but the film does little to uphold the argument.  Instead, it was correctly understood and commercially successful as instant camp; the thudding last gasp in a chain of FOX films charting the paths of three gal pals, their life, love, careers & personal catastrophes; with titles going back to the early ‘30s.  More specifically, following up on those CinemaScope triptychs (the wide frame ratio just made for bosom-buddy trios) from HOW TO MARRY A MILLIONAIRE/’53 to THREE COINS IN THE FOUNTAIN/’54 and THE BEST OF EVERYTHING/’59.  (Many more in-between.)  Each one coming in a bit more shaded than the last before reaching SusannLand where big city stress, sex, addiction (pills & booze), bad relationships and suicide are seen thru a glass darkly.  And yet, it's somehow all inadvertently hilarious, dumbed down to a playing level that leaves no one unscathed.  (On screen and off, none of the major creatives in front or behind the camera ever worked on a quality project again.*)  Patty Duke wins the booby prize (ironically with the smallest ‘boobies’ in the pic!), over-emoting to beat the band as the too-much-too-soon self-centered singing star who self-destructs on ‘reds’ and ‘blues’; Barbara Perkins the boring one gets VOGUE-ish pseudo Pop fashion montages as inadequate recompense; Sharon Tate stoops to conquer, making ‘artistic’ soft-porn to support a husband under a neurological death sentence.  Meanwhile, ‘guest star’ Susan Hayward shows up to top & tail as a B’way legend sporting hideous sparkly outfits that don’t suit her.  (Left over when Judy Garland ankled just before filming?)  Two more Susann laughers followed, THE LOVE MACHINE/’71 and ONCE IS NOT ENOUGH/’75.  By then, who cared?

ATTENTION MUST BE PAID:  *The one exception is the score, especially the title song which everyone thinks is by Burt Bacharach (Dionne Warwick sings it), but actually is Dory & André Previn.

No comments: