Now Over 5500 Reviews and (near) Daily Updates!

WELCOME! Use the search engines on this site (or your own off-site engine of choice) to gain easy access to the complete MAKSQUIBS Archive; more than 5500 posts and counting. (New posts added every day or so.)

You can check on all our titles by typing the Title, Director, Actor or 'Keyword' you're looking for in the Search Engine of your choice (include the phrase MAKSQUIBS) or just use the BLOGSPOT.com Search Box at the top left corner of the page.

Feel free to place comments directly on any of the film posts and to test your film knowledge with the CONTESTS scattered here & there. (Hey! No Googling allowed. They're pretty easy.)

Send E-mails to MAKSQUIBS@yahoo.com . (Let us know if the TRANSLATE WIDGET works!) Or use the Profile Page or Comments link for contact.

Thanks for stopping by.

Thursday, November 18, 2021

THE THING (1982)

After consolidating a rep for ultra-profitable small-budget indies with a big studio hit (HALLOWEEN/’78 to ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK/’81), John Carpenter underperformed critically & commercially on this pricey nihilistic followup, only to see it grow over the years in popularity & influence, undeservedly so.  Ostensibly expanded from the old Christian Nyby/Howard Hawks’ Arctic Monster pic, THE THING FROM ANOTHER WORLD/’51, it’s more ALIEN/’79 meets INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS (the glossy ‘78 remake).  And if you can still feel the unanswered commercial expectations of Universal Studio execs,* you can also see why it eventually caught on.  But Carpenter (or is it scipter Bill Lancaster?) makes missteps almost from the start (one minor; one major) and the film never quite recovers.  It opens well, an unsettling prologue as a rogue Norwegian helicopter from a neighboring Antarctic Science Outpost hunts down a husky in the snow, one of the American crew’s dogs.  (An updated silent film trope pointing out the villain by having him kick a little boy’s dog.)  But then the film proper opens with Kurt Russell wrecking his personal computer after losing at chess.  Really?  And where is he likely to get a replacement in 1982 Antarctica?  Character sacrificed for a cheap gag.  Next, they give the whole game away with an alien monster doing its transformation trick on the dogs and then a human.  Nothing for the rest of the film to do but enlarge scale in gore & creepy creatures bursting thru flesh.  No doubt, the idea was to stay ahead of an audience already on to the alien threat and looking for bigger gross-outs, or see who’ll die next, or hum Ennio Morricone Carpenter-esque repetitive two-note theme.

SCREWY THOUGHT OF THE DAY: Why does D.P. Dean Cundey give so many of his films the same weird orange glow?

ATTENTION MUST BE PAID: *Universal Execs hoping to match ALIEN’s ‘In Space No One Can Hear You Scream’ only coming up with ‘MAN IS THE WARMEST PLACE TO HIDE.’  Lame

No comments: